Hi Everyone,

Thanks very much for your helpful responses and suggestions. I will use the
BCA assay.

Cheers,
Raji


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:27 AM, R. M. Garavito <rmgarav...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Roger,
>
> While I agree with your list, the BCA assay does not use molybdate (as we
> make it from scratch with bicinchoninic acid, sodium carbonate, sodium
> bicarbonate, sodium tartrate, and cupric sulfate pentahydrate).  For
> membrane proteins, I prefer the BCA assay until the protein is pure enough
> to use A280.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> ******************************************************************
> *R. Michael Garavito, Ph.D.*
> *Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology*
> *603 Wilson Rd., Rm. 513*
> *Michigan State University      *
> *East Lansing, MI 48824-1319*
> *Office:*  *(517) 355-9724 <%28517%29%20355-9724>     Lab:  (517)
> 353-9125 <%28517%29%20353-9125>*
> *FAX:  (517) 353-9334 <%28517%29%20353-9334>
>  Email:  rmgarav...@gmail.com <garav...@gmail.com>*
> ******************************************************************
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Roger Rowlett <rrowl...@colgate.edu> wrote:
>
>  Your basic choices for protein assays are:
>
>    1. Alkaline copper methods (e.g., Biuret and micro-biuret)
>    2. alkaline copper + molybdate methods (e.g., Lowry, BCA assays)
>    3. Hydrophobic dye methods (e.g. Bradford)
>    4. UV methods (e.g., A280, A230, A210, etc.)
>
> Method 1 is least sensitive to amino acid composition, but is also has
> highest detection limits. Thiols interfere. Method 2 is very idiosyncratic
> with amino acid composition, and also subject to interference by thiols.
> Method 3 is not usable in detergent solutions. Method 4 has many
> inteferences as most everything absorbs in the far UV region.
>
> If you have some special protein cofactors, metals, chromophores, etc.
> these can be exploited for better measurements. For ecample metalloproteins
> are easy to quantify by ICP-OES or TXRF if they are reasonably pure.
>
> Cheers,
>
> _______________________________________
> Roger S. Rowlett
> Gordon & Dorothy Kline Professor
> Department of Chemistry
> Colgate University
> 13 Oak Drive
> Hamilton, NY 13346
>
> tel: (315)-228-7245
> ofc: (315)-228-7395
> fax: (315)-228-7935
> email: rrowl...@colgate.edu
>  On 2/13/2014 10:06 AM, Raji Edayathumangalam wrote:
>
> Dear CC4BBers,
>
>  I am trying to figure out what is the best way to determine the protein
> concentration of my membrane protein. My purified membrane protein is in
> 20mM Tris pH 7, 150mM NaCl and 0.02% DDM (CMC of DDM=0.0076%).
>
>  After reading the friendly manuals and searching online, I've learned
> that detergents interferes with assays like Bradford but can't find good
> descriptions of what works best. For now, I am trying to estimate
> concentration from absorbance at 280nm and using molar extinction
> coefficients based on aromatic amino acids, but again suspect detergent
> interference. I would like to know what other folks working on membrane
> proteins are doing.
>
>  Thanks very much.
> Raji
>
>  --
> Raji Edayathumangalam
> Instructor in Neurology, Harvard Medical School
> Research Associate, Brigham and Women's Hospital
> Visiting Research Scholar, Brandeis University
>
>
>
>


-- 
Raji Edayathumangalam
Instructor in Neurology, Harvard Medical School
Research Associate, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Visiting Research Scholar, Brandeis University

Reply via email to