-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear Pietro,

You may take a textbook into account which deals with Laue
diffraction. If you search for the keyword "Laue" and the author
"Helliwell" at the IUCR journals, you will get a large number of hits,
indicating that this is by no means a 'trivial' issue (e.g.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0909049599006366 for an overview or
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0108767387098763 for the treatment of
harmonics).

As far as I understand, certain scaling programs take the lambda/2
contribution of monochromators into account.

Regards,
Tim Gruene

On 08/20/2013 04:36 PM, Pietro Roversi wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I am shocked by my own ignorance, and you feel free to do the same,
> but do you agree with me that according to Bragg's Law a
> diffraction maximum at an angle theta has contributions to its
> intensity from planes at a spacing d for order 1, planes of spacing
> 2*d for order n=2, etc. etc.?
> 
> In other words as the diffraction angle is a function of n/d:
> 
> theta=arcsin(lambda/2 * n/d)
> 
> several indices are associated with diffraction at the same angle?
> 
> (I guess one could also prove the same result by a number of Ewald
> constructions using Ewald spheres of radius (1/n*lambda with
> n=1,2,3 ...)
> 
> All textbooks I know on the argument neglect to mention this and in
> fact only n=1 is ever considered.
> 
> Does anybody know a book where this trivial issue is discussed?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ciao
> 
> Pietro
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my Desktop
> 
> Dr. Pietro Roversi Oxford University Biochemistry Department -
> Glycobiology Division South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QU England - UK 
> Tel. 0044 1865 275339

- -- 
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFSE4EgUxlJ7aRr7hoRAomhAJ94WrXRCTx8gevMAzrhenVri2EkhwCghyC1
UuckhqtUEG0uB9hheG1uxz0=
=+cAo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to