On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:37 +0000, Marcin Wojdyr wrote: > Running times were, correspondingly, 32.2s, 35.1s and 18.7s. > Numbers are almost too impressive to believe :)
How does it compare with ifort (which I thought should be the fastest
option on intel processors and thus unavailable (not free) for most DIY
compilation given licensing issues)?
--
Oh, suddenly throwing a giraffe into a volcano to make water is crazy?
Julian, King of Lemurs
