Dear All,

I have few basic questions for which I need help. I have a
3.4 A data and I have processed it to P4.

1.      
I used pointless to find SG, it suggests P41 21
2. But I see two strong intensities in systematic absences

Intensities of systematic absences

     
h   k   l 
Intensity     Sigma   I/Sigma

 

      0   0  
2      -0.7       0.3     
-2.0

      0   0  
3       1.0       0.4      
2.3

      0   0  
5       0.3       0.7      
0.4

      0   0  
6      -0.7       0.9     
-0.8

      0   0  
7      -0.4       0.9     
-0.4

      0   0  
9      -0.2       0.9     
-0.2

      0   0 
10       1.3       1.2      
1.1

      0   0 
11      -0.8       2.1     
-0.4

      0   0 
13       1.2       2.1      
0.6

      0   0 
14       2.3       1.8      
1.3

      0   0 
15      -1.0       1.9     
-0.5

      0   0 
17       2.4       2.0      
1.2

      0  
0  18      21.1      
4.5       4.7

      0  
0  19      90.2      
6.0      15.0

      3   0  
0      -0.1       0.2     
-0.8

      5   0  
0       0.2       0.2      
0.9

      7   0  
0      -0.3       0.2     
-1.3

      9   0  
0       0.0       0.5      
0.0

     11   0  
0      -0.2       0.6     
-0.4

     13   0  
0       0.8       0.7      
1.1

     15   0  
0      -1.2       0.6     
-1.9

     17   0  
0      -0.3       0.8     
-0.4

     19   0  
0      -1.4       0.6     
-2.6

     21   0  
0      -2.2       1.2     
-1.9

     23   0   0     
-0.8       1.3      -0.6

     25   0  
0      -1.2       1.1     
-1.1

     27   0  
0      -0.9       1.6     
-0.5

     29   0  
0      -0.4       1.7     
-0.2

     31   0  
0      -7.1       1.3     
-5.3

     33   0  
0      -2.4       2.1     
-1.1

2.      
When I used phaser  for MR, it gave weak solution in p43, so I
scaled data in p43 21 2 (this also two intesities high like above in systamatic 
absences) and used for Phaser to get the following solution

SINGLE solution

 

   SOLU SET 
RFZ=4.5 TFZ=9.4 PAK=0 LLG=105 TFZ==10.1 RF++ TFZ=17.7 PAK=0 LLG=282  TFZ==15.6 
LLG=285 TFZ==12.4

   SOLU SPAC P 43 21 2

   SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 153.1 50.3
73.2 FRAC -0.11 0.03 -0.94 BFAC -2.65

   SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 148.4 129.9
252.8 FRAC -0.32 -0.35 1.07 BFAC 4.01

   Ensemble ensemble1 RMS variance(s): 1.13

3.      I used this solution to further
refine the model in refmac, using local ncs, with/without jelly, optimized
weight/weight of 0.03, map sharpening with B=20 in several rounds.

 

I noticed that R factor R factor stayed around 33% while R free keeps
floating around 42%. I could see some density for missing loop in the model and
I could build but the R work and R free moving apart. By reading, I understand
that this is very common for low resolution data unless I use appropriate 
restraints.


 

I am wondering if my space group is correct? I had understood that if it’s
right SG, high intensity reflections will not be found in systematic absences
but I started doubting if I have understood correctly. 

 

 This is my first low resolution
data, I want use this opportunity to learn refmac well. So could you please let
me know if my doubt is right regarding SG and  how do
I troubleshoot.

 

Thanks

SDY                                       

Reply via email to