My lab has had a C3 for almost 8 years now. It's very good for coli, not so 
good for yeast as 25-30 kpsi is in the extreme range of the instrument and 
you'll wear out seals etc pretty quickly. For those pressures you'll also need 
high pressure air. You'll also need to be fairly disciplined in cleaning, so 
its not great for sharing between different labs (we all knows how that 
goes...). Cleaning yourself is possible, but to open it you'll need a big 
wrench to get sufficient torque. But again, for Ecoli it's very good. We've 
also had good experiences with the avestin people coming in to do maintenance 
in terms of waiting time etc.

Bert
________________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Marcelo Carlos 
Sousa [marcelo.so...@colorado.edu]
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:18 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] OFF TOPIC: recommendations for High Pressure Homogenizers

Sorry for the off topic question, but it is relevant to those that produce 
proteins for crystallographic purposes:

We are looking to replace an old French Press with a high pressure homogenizer 
for cell disruption (E. coli and yeast). We are currently looking at the 
Avestin C3 and the Niro Panda 2000. I would appreciate any feedback (positive 
or negative) from users of these instruments (or any other competing 
homogenizer).

Thanks in advance

Marcelo

Reply via email to