Thanks, these are great links!
Evette

On Jul 13, 2012, at 7:39 PM, "Andrew Purkiss-Trew" 
<a.purk...@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk> wrote:

> Quoting Jacob Keller <j-kell...@fsm.northwestern.edu>:
> 
>>> 
>>> The expansion ratio of liquid to gaseous nitrogen is approximately 1:700,
>>> that is, 1 liter of liquid becomes 700 liters of gas (at room temperature).
>>> When you are in a room that is 3 (~10ft) meters tall, 6 (~18ft) meters wide
>>> and 10 (~30ft) meters long and you assume that it is poorly ventilated
>>> (i.e. no gas replacement at all), then you will have 3x6x10 = 180m3 volume
>>> of gas, which is 180,000 liters. Air consists of 21% oxygen and is
>>> considered deficient if it goes down to 19.5%. OSHA recommends having
>>> monitors present in the case you might, in worst case scenario, reach
>>> 19.5%. Note: I don't know, but it seems unlikely that you are critically
>>> injured at 19.5%
>>> 
>> 
>> How can this OSHA number be right? At fairly high altitude, say 2500 m, the
>> partial pressure of O2 will be about 75% of that at sea level, and most are
>> okay with it--so how can a drop from 21% to 19.5% have any importance? Is
>> N2 competing with O2, perhaps? Never heard of that. Can N2 really be a
>> poison, such that we are constantly poised at the cusp of suffocation?
>> 
> 
> Not N2 poisoning, but lack of Oxygen in the blood. At altitude, the body 
> adjusts by breathing deeper and faster and people can become acclimatised (so 
> giving rise to altitude training for athletes). The really dangerous levels, 
> for a healthy adult, are a fair way below the 19.5%. The UK generally seems 
> to have O2 alarms set at 19% and maybe a second alarm at 17%.
> 
> More details are given on the OHSA website 
> (http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_id=25743&p_table=INTERPRETATIONS
>   found with a quick google) and on one of the UK Liquid Nitrogen supplier's 
> websites (http://www.cryoservice.co.uk/oxygen_depletion.aspx)
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Andrew Purkiss
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Reply via email to