Sorry, I said that last part wrong.  I meant it is sometimes helpful to*increase
* the salt by 50% when scaling up.


On 19 March 2012 22:29, Patrick Shaw Stewart <patr...@douglas.co.uk> wrote:

>
> Rajesh
>
> If you set up the volumes you suggest you will probably get
> precipitation.  This is counterintuitive until you realize that (as Ed
> says) you will be losing a lot of protein with those small drops.  When you
> scale up the surface area to volume ratio is lower, so a smaller proportion
> of the protein is lost.  Therefore you go *up* on the phase diagram and
> get precipitant or very small crystals.
>
> Normally halving the amount of protein for the hits from 200 nl drops
> works (suggesting that half the protein is lost from such small drops).
> Try say 500+1000+500 (don't reduce the volume of seed stock because the
> solution that you suspended the crystals in may be important).  Or dilute
> the protein and use 1000+1000+500.
>
> For the hits from the 450 nl drops you could reduce or dilute the protein
> by say 25.%.
>
> Or make plenty of seed-stock and try seeding into a random screen again
> with larger drops, say 1.5+1+0.5 ul
>
> Those tiny crystals should be good for seeding, don't worry about that
> (provided they are protein of course).
>
> Streak seeding may work but bear in mind that roughly a third of the
> precipitant comes from the seed stock in your 250 nl drops.
>
> You can add the seed stock with a syringe and needle if you don't have
> suitable robot ;)
>
> Experience and data-mining suggests that reducing the salt precipitant (in
> high-salt drops) or salt additive (in PEG drops) by around 50% may be
> helpful too when scaling up - I'm not sure why this works.
>
> Good luck
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For the hits in the 250 nl drops you are probably losing
>
> On 19 March 2012 20:31, Rajesh kumar <ccp4...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Dear All,
>>
>> I have few papers in hand which  explain me about microseeding, matrix
>> microseeding, and cross seeding.
>> I have also read few earlier threads and some more literature in google.
>> Using Phoenix robot, I did a matrix micro-seeding and matrix cross
>> seeding. I have few hits with this.
>> In 96 well I used 100+100+50 nL and 200+200+50 nl (protein+screen+seed)
>> in separate expts.
>> I have hard time to plan to translate this 96 sitting drop well plate to
>> 24 well plate to refine the conditions to get better crystals. only 1-2
>> hits are small crystals and they are tiny.
>>
>>  I wonder in 24 well plate, if I should do-
>> 1)  for Example 500+500+50nl (I am sure I cant add less that 500
>> nL precisely)
>> 2) to a drop of 500+500 nL do microseeding/streaking with a hair
>>
>> I appreciate if you could advise and share some practical ways to further
>> my experiment.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> Regards,
>> Rajesh
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  patr...@douglas.co.uk    Douglas Instruments Ltd.
>  Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
>  Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart
>
>  http://www.douglas.co.uk
>  Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090    US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
>  Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36
>
>


-- 
 patr...@douglas.co.uk    Douglas Instruments Ltd.
 Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
 Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

 http://www.douglas.co.uk
 Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090    US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
 Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36

Reply via email to