All,


We have been following the CCP4BB discussion with interest. As has been 
mentioned on several occasions, 
the JCSG has maintained, for several years now, an open archive of all 
diffraction datasets associated with 
our deposited structures. Overall this has been a highly positive experience 
and many developers, researchers, 
teachers and students have benefited from our archive. We currently have close 
to 100 registered users of our

archive and we seem to receive a new batch of users each time our archive is 
acknowledged in a paper or is 
mentioned at a conference. Building on this initial success, we are currently 
extending our archive to include 
unsolved datasets, which will help us more readily share data and collaborate 
with methods developers on some 
of our less tractable datasets. We are also planning to include screening 
images for all crystals evaluated as part 
of the JCSG pipeline (largely as a feedback tool to help improve crystal 
quality).



At JCSG, we benefit tremendously from our central database, which already 
tracks all required metadata associated 
with any crystal. Thus I agree with other comments that the cost of such an 
undertaking should not be underestimated. 
The cost of the hardware may be modest; however, people and resources are 
needed to develop and maintain a robust 
and reliable archive.



To date we have not assigned DOIs to our datasets, but we certainly feel this 
would be of value going forward and are 
currently considering this option for our revised archive, which is currently 
in development.



If successful then this may form a good prototype system, which could be opened 
up to a broader community outside 
of JCSG.



We (JCSG) have already shared much of our experiences with the IUCR working 
group and we would be happy to 
participate
 and contribute to any ongoing  efforts.



Sincerely,
Ashley.Deacon

JCSG Structure Determination Core Leader

Reply via email to