Dear Adrian, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 06:29:50PM +0200, Adrian Goldman wrote: > I have no problem with this idea as an opt-in. However I loathe being forced > to do things - for my own good or anyone else's. But unless I read the tenor > of this discussion completely wrongly, opt-in is precisely what is not being > proposed.
I understood it slightly different - see Gerard Bricogne's points in https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1110&L=CCP4BB&F=&S=&P=363135 which sounds very much like an opt-in? Such a starting point sounds very similar to that we had with initial PDB submission (optional for publication) and then structure factor deposition. Cheers Clemens -- *************************************************************** * Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com * * Global Phasing Ltd. * Sheraton House, Castle Park * Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK *-------------------------------------------------------------- * BUSTER Development Group (http://www.globalphasing.com) ***************************************************************
