On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:39 +0300, Adrian Goldman wrote:
> Of course this has to be the case.  I think most of us walk around with with 
> mobile phones that have memory and processing power more powerful than all of 
> the computers available before 1990.
> 
> Some of the things that seem difficult in Lion and are nanny-state-ish such 
> as automatic file versioning (not that I am running Lion yet, mind) - well is 
> it the case that all of the experts on the CCP4BB have _never_ deleted a file 
> they didn't mean to delete?  _Never_ had Word (O, Coot) crash taking with it 
> 6 hours worth of changes that should have been saved but weren't?
> 
> If so, I feel humbled because I have made these mistakes and more.
> 
> Adrian

There is nothing nanny-state-ish (or indeed new) about automatic file
versioning. VMS (which was the major operating system that CCP4
targetted in the pre-Unix days) had it in the 1980's and I don't recall
anyone moaning about it at the time. As you say, it could be a lifesaver
if you overwrote something by mistake. VMS allowed you to purge old
versions completely though, whereas Lion doesn't: that is the
difference.

Regards,
Peter.

-- 
Peter Keller                                     Tel.: +44 (0)1223 353033
Global Phasing Ltd.,                             Fax.: +44 (0)1223 366889
Sheraton House,
Castle Park,
Cambridge CB3 0AX
United Kingdom

Reply via email to