It probably is I2 (== C2) so it would be better to re-integrate in C2 in 
Mosflm, as the true beta angle may not be precisely 90deg

The CCs and R-factors are not very good, so it is worth looking at the scores 
for the individual 2-fold axes output by Pointless, to check that one of the 
axes really is much better than the other two, ie that it is I2/C2 rather than 
I222

If there is real doubt, it may be better to solve the structure in both space 
groups, and decide later which fits the data better

Phil

On 6 Aug 2011, at 00:15, WENHE ZHONG wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Recently I did some soaking experiments for crystals. Most of them did not 
> change their space group (I222). But one of them seems to be a little bit 
> different (I222 ---> I121). 
> The following is the pointless data: (the data was processed by Mosflm under 
> space group I222)
> 
>    Laue Group        Lklhd   NetZc  Zc+   Zc-    CC    CC-  Rmeas   R-  Delta 
> ReindexOperator
> 
> > 1  I 1 2/m 1  **   0.687   2.55  8.25  5.71   0.83  0.57   0.32  0.52   0.0 
> > [-h,-k,l]
> > 2       P -1       0.171   2.02  8.54  6.52   0.85  0.65   0.32  0.45   0.0 
> > [-h,-k,1/2h+1/2k+1/2l]
> - 3    I m m m       0.050   6.98  6.98  0.00   0.70  0.00   0.42  0.00   0.0 
> [h,k,l]
>   4  I 1 2/m 1       0.050   0.22  7.09  6.87   0.71  0.69   0.42  0.42   0.0 
> [k,-h,l]
>   5  I 1 2/m 1       0.043   0.06  7.05  6.99   0.70  0.70   0.42  0.42   0.0 
> [h,-l,k]
> 
> Best Solution:    space group I 1 2 1
> 
>    Reindex operator:                  [-h,-k,l]                
>    Laue group probability:             0.687
>    Systematic absence probability:     1.000
>    Total probability:                  0.687
>    Space group confidence:             0.595
>    Laue group confidence               0.595
> 
>    Unit cell:   104.1  108.6  264.8        90     90     90
> 
>    54.32 to   3.41   - Resolution range used for Laue group search
> 
>    54.32 to   2.25   - Resolution range in file, used for systematic absence 
> check
> 
>    Number of batches in file:    400
> 
> The data do not appear to be twinned, from the L-test
> : 
> 
> WARNING:
> The chosen output crystal system is different from that used for integration 
> of the input file(s).
> You should rerun the integration in the chosen crystal system because the 
> cell constraints differ.
> 
> The input crystal system is body-centred orthorhombic
>  (Cell:   104.1  108.6  264.8        90     90     90)
> The crystal system chosen for output is body-centred monoclinic
>  (Cell:   104.1  108.6  264.8        90     90     90)
> 
> I couldn't see the difference between I222 and I121. May I ask do I need to 
> go back to the Mosflm process step and choose other space group for the 
> processing? Thank you. 
> 
> King regards,
> Wenhe
> 

Reply via email to