This may be too late to be of use, but as one of the authors of the sfall/overlapmap system..

sfall does generate a coded map which flags every grid point with a unique ID of the nearest atom, ie one which is unique providing there are not too many atoms - it is adequate for most molecules though prob. not for the ribosome..
A grid point is assigned the ID of the nearest atom.
And the default radius of an atom is indeed 2.5A, which will generate overlap between most atoms.

However for a reasonable B factor and a fine grid (SFALL has a default grid spacing of 0.5A) most of the significant density is correctly assigned to a given atom. So the CC is reasonably accurate for atoms with acceptable B factors, but not very accurate for those with B> 100 say..

Eleanor


On 05/02/2011 07:18 PM, James M Holton wrote:
The CCP4 program that makes the "label map" you are looking for is SFALL. It can be told 
to make a .map file where each grid point is still a floating-point number, but instead of the 
usual electron density it "encodes" the residue number, atom number, etc. The OVERLAPMAP 
program knows how to decode this, and you specify it as a third map, in addition to the two you 
want to correlate.

However, the distance from the center of each atom that is still "part of it" is an 
interesting question. I think the default is 2.5 A or so, but this depends on the B factor, and 
probably grid points far from the center of an atom "should" count less than ones near 
the middle?

   If what you really want is the number of electrons in a region, then I would 
recommend occupancy refinement (which you can now do in REFMAC), and then 
adding up occ*Z for the atoms of interest (where Z is the atomic number).  This 
has the nice property of being independent of F000 estimates.

-James Holton
MAD Scientist

On May 2, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Matt Warkentin<mattw...@gmail.com>  wrote:

Hi all

I'm trying to 'measure' the density in a region of my structure by integrating 
the electron density there (notwithstanding errors in F000).  I understand that 
both overlapmap and phenix.real_space_correlation compute density surrounding 
individual atoms for their calculations.  Is there any way to get that info out 
of either of them?

Are the per-residue "Fo" and "Fc" columns in the output of 
phenix.real_space_correlation actually what I am looking for?  If so what are the units and how is 
F000 handled?

Thanks a bunch to anyone who can clear this up.

Matt

Reply via email to