Dear Jürgen, is this an assignment operator or an equal sign? For if it's the latter it could read that the result of processing data with XDS are bad data, which is rather rude and probably not what you meant.
Tim On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 06:55:43AM -0500, Jürgen Bosch wrote: > Bad data = processing with XDS > > Jürgen > > ...................... > Jürgen Bosch > Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health > Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology > Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute > 615 North Wolfe Street, W8708 > Baltimore, MD 21205 > Phone: +1-410-614-4742 > Lab: +1-410-614-4894 > Fax: +1-410-955-3655 > http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/ > > On Jan 28, 2011, at 6:46, José Trincão <trin...@dq.fct.unl.pt> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I have been trying to squeeze the most out of a bad data set (P1, > > anisotropic, crystals not reproducible). I had very incomplete data due to > > high mosaicity and lots of overlaps. The completeness was about 80% overall > > to ~3A. Yesterday I noticed that I could process the data much better > > fixing the mosaicity to 0.5 in imosflm. I got about 95% complete up to 2.5A > > but with a multiplicity of 1.7. I tried to integrate the same data fixing > > the mosaicity at different values ranging from 0.2 to 0.6 and saw the trend > > in completeness, Rmerge and multiplicity. > > Now, is there any reason why I should not just merge all these together and > > feed them to scala in order to increase multiplicity? > > Am I missing something? > > > > Thanks for any comments! > > > > Jose > > > > > > José Trincão, PhD CQFB@FCT-UNL > > 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal > > > > "It's very hard to make predictions... especially about the future" - Niels > > Bohr -- -- Tim Gruene Institut fuer anorganische Chemie Tammannstr. 4 D-37077 Goettingen phone: +49 (0)551 39 22149 GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
