Hi YB,

For membrane protein crystallization it is common practice (although not always 
necessary) to dialyze the protein after the final concentration step (against 
GF buffer). The problem with DDM is that dialysis is slow due to the low cmc, 
and in general it is advisable to finish the prep and set up drops as quickly 
as possible. I would not dialyze more than 1 x O/N, although if your protein is 
really stable you could try longer. You could also try 100 kDa cutoff 
concentrators, as these may allow passage of empty DDM micelles. As for 
measuring the detergent concentration, in the case of DDM and other 
sugar-containing detergents you could do a sugar (Fehling's) kind of assay. I'm 
not sure if anything has been published, but it should be fairly easy to do. 
You could also try TLC, but this may be less accurate.

Also, 10 mg/ml is not high at all (although its a good starting point), and you 
should try much higher if most drops are clear: try 50 mg/ml and see what 
happens.

Good luck, Bert


On 10/4/10 10:28 AM, "yybbll" <yyb...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear all,

I want to crystallize a symport transporter, which contains 12 transmembrane 
alpha-helices. We used Ni-resin column firstly, and then size exclusion. After 
size exclusion, only one peak, it is very nice. the final condition is 10 mM 
mes, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM sucrose, 1 mM DTT, and 0.02% DDM. The CMC of DDM is 
about 0.008%. However, when we concentrate protein using a concentrator with 50 
kDa cutoff, detergent all was concentrated. So final the concentration of 
detergent should be very high (10 times more than CMC). We don't know how to 
detect the concentration of detergent. We used these samples to grow crystal. 
We found almost drops are clear, and the final concentration of protein is 
about 10 mg/ml. For membrane protein, I think this concentration is high. But 
for us, we can obtain so high concentration easily.

Could anybody tell me how to detect the concentration of detergent?

And how to  dilute detergent?

Thanks all.

Y.B. Lin

2010-10-04
________________________________
yybbll

Reply via email to