> "important".  The 
> answer to the last question appears to be "never".  The 
> "background"-subtracted spot intensities really are the square of the 
> Fourier transform of the AVERAGE electron density in a unit 
> cell.  Yes, 
> the arithmetic average.  Does not matter where the background comes 
> from.  This is another beer I owe Colin.

James, without knowing more about the innards of your random-number
generator, it's not clear to me how the random number sequence that you
generate simulates the correlated displacements that are responsible for
DS, i.e. either between atoms related by lattice translations in
adjacent unit cells (-> 'acoustic' DS), or between atoms in pseudo-rigid
groups within the same unit cell (-> 'optic' DS), or even correlations
between the displacements of electrons on the same atom (-> 'Einstein'
DS).  Surely the whole purpose of a 'normal' random number generator is
to avoid correlations in the generated sequence.  Of course, in practice
for a sufficiently long sequence of software-generated random numbers
it's impossible to avoid correlations, but even then it's extremely
unlikely any correlations that are accidentally produced by defects in
the algorithm will simulate the physical situation.  You would surely
have to deliberately design in the correlations to produce meaningful
results.

Unless you are properly simulating the set of correlated displacements
that give rise to DS, it's hardly surprising that you don't see any DS
effects in the measured intensities.  I think we can take it that DS
effects are real!

Cheers

-- Ian


Disclaimer
This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information 
intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed 
except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended 
recipient you must not review, use, disclose, copy, distribute or take any 
action in reliance upon it. If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify Astex Therapeutics Ltd by emailing 
i.tic...@astex-therapeutics.com and destroy all copies of the message and any 
attached documents. 
Astex Therapeutics Ltd monitors, controls and protects all its messaging 
traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy. The Company accepts no 
liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and 
attachments having left the Astex Therapeutics domain.  Unless expressly 
stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of 
Astex Therapeutics Ltd. The recipient should check this email and any 
attachments for the presence of computer viruses. Astex Therapeutics Ltd 
accepts no liability for damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. 
E-mail is susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, 
and tampering, Astex Therapeutics Ltd only send and receive e-mails on the 
basis that the Company is not liable for any such alteration or any 
consequences thereof.
Astex Therapeutics Ltd., Registered in England at 436 Cambridge Science Park, 
Cambridge CB4 0QA under number 3751674

Reply via email to