Sean C. Gay, PhD Postdoctoral Scholar Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla, CA 92093
I have a 2.0A data set that I solved using an ensemble of 5 related
structures in Phaser. My Z-scores for the solution are fantastic (RFZ=
28.7, TFZ=24.6), but my LLG is very negative (-698.2). The LLG increases
by almost 800 (started at -1488.6) during the course of the run. The
density for the solution is great and the solution model fits it
very well. I'm wondering why the Z-scores and LLG contradict each other.
Should I be happy with the large increase in LLG or should I be
concerned about the final value still being negative?
- [ccp4bb] high z-scores, negative LLG in Phaser Sean Gay
- Re: [ccp4bb] high z-scores, negative LLG in Phaser Mark J. van Raaij
- Re: [ccp4bb] high z-scores, negative LLG in Phaser Randy Read
- Re: [ccp4bb] high z-scores, negative LLG in Phaser Mark J. van Raaij