Hi,



>From the experiance of mine I can tell you that the crystal size sometimes 
>matters between these two methods. Hanging drop may yield bigger crystals than 
>sitting drop, that may be due to the evaporation rate(surface area). Hanging 
>drop allow us to set different protocols also like free interface diffusion, 
>area covered by the drp etc.



These informations are gained purely by experiance.



cheers

Deb





On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:40:35 +0530  wrote

>I have noticed that a significant majority of crystallizations are done in 

>hanging- rather than sitting-drop configuration, and considering the 

>significant extra labor involved in hanging drops, can only understand this 

>preference as a historical bias. I understand that sometimes one technique 

>works and not the other, but all things being equal, why is hanging drop 

>still "hanging around?" Any insights appreciated...

>

>Jacob Keller

>

>*******************************************

>Jacob Pearson Keller

>Northwestern University

>Medical Scientist Training Program

>Dallos Laboratory

>F. Searle 1-240

>2240 Campus Drive

>Evanston IL 60208

>lab: 847.491.2438

>cel: 773.608.9185

>email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu

>*******************************************

>

Reply via email to