Hi, I had a similar story like yours.Then I added a drop of 10ul simulated mother liquot which contains much higher concentrations of all components in the normal mother liquot. Sometimes, the crystals attached to the plastic would float to the surface. If not, take another 10ul, but blew it to the bottom plastic with a pippetman back and forth, and some crystals would also leave the plastic(But you have to be very careful to do this.)
My friend Jill solved her similar problem by hanging drop setup instead of sitting drop. Good luck. Deliang ----- Original Message ----- From: Savvas Savvides To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 3:05 PM Subject: [ccp4bb] sticky crystals Dear colleagues, we have been growing crystals of a protein complex in sitting-drop geometry that stick to the bottom of the drop remarkably well. It's as if they are glued onto the plastic. This makes crystal handling next to impossible without destroying the crystals. We have tried whiskers, loops, all kinds of micro-tools, and pipetting techniques to no avail. I can say at the outset that we have been unsuccessful in growing these crystals in hanging-drops or at 4 degrees. Deglycosylating the complex also leads to nowhere. In fact, we are only able to get crystals from homogeneously glycosylated protein produced in HEK293S/I- cells. In the meantime we are playing with the idea of siliconizing the sitting-drop depressions to alter the crystal/plate interface. But then again, nucleation events on the plastic may be the reason we are getting crystals in the first place. We have also thought of trying microseeding to have more control on nucleation issues. Our protein production is quite limiting and forces us to be very selective with our experimentation. Nonetheless, while we are waiting for fresh material to explore some of these ideas we would like to make the most out of the crystals we have grown thus far. We would therefore very much appreciate any input/ideas on manipulating these crystals for data collection. Best wishes Savvas ---- Savvas Savvides L-ProBE, Unit for Structural Biology Ghent University K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35 9000 Ghent, BELGIUM office: +32-(0)9-264.51.24 ; mobile: +32-(0)472-92.85.19 Email: savvas.savvi...@ugent.be http://www.lprobe.ugent.be/xray.html From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Katarina Moravcevic Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:52 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] pseudo translation Hi all, here is a question from a beginner. I have a home source data set that indexed and scaled in a P2 space group (a=46.704,b=59.362, c=48.783, alpha=90.0, beta=104.469, gamma=90.0) with predicted 2mol/au. After failing to get a MR solution with Phaser I ran the phenix.xtriage which showed that I have a large (89.18) Patterson peak at 0.5 0 0.5 which indicates pseudo translational symmetry. I was wondering if there is anything I could do with this data to get around this problem. Given that I don't have a lot of experience any suggestion/explanation would be fantastic. Thanks in advance K E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) Database version: 5.11630 http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
