They're all great! - Linux offers limitless possibility with its concomitant complexity and chaos.
- Mac OS X offers the design integrity, consistency, and efficiency of centralized control. - Windows guarantees lowest common denominator functionality for a rock bottom price. So why not buy hardware & software that can run all three? ...with native-like performance. ...simultaneously. -----Original Message----- From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of William G. Scott Sent: Tue 11/18/2008 7:37 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Crystallographic computing platform recommendations? On Nov 18, 2008, at 7:01 AM, Mischa Machius wrote: > For linux, I would recommend a commercial solution, For linux, I actually ditched the commercial solution for Ubuntu, because it was vastly easier as a non-expert to maintain. Having said that, like you, I have found running Mac OS X to be the most cost-effective in terms of time and utility. Bill
