Speaking of good material to attempt to understand crystallographic concepts with , there a video link to the talk given by Airlie McCoy based on the "Liking likelyhood" paper Its on the phaser publications page or at this link<http://erice2005.docking.org/vcourse/16mon/1145-McCoy/McCoy.wmv> http://erice2005.docking.org/vcourse/16mon/1145-McCoy/McCoy.wmv
There is also a talk from Randy reed at that location<http://erice2005.docking.org/vcourse/18wed/0945-Read/Read.wmv> It would be great if other such talks could be made available as videos . , for all of us to benefit from . It will be great to have a youtube or google video "channel" for such videos. That way google pays for the bandwidth instead of erice2005 or ccp4. Thanks for this thread.. Hari On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Jacob Keller < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps you could translate and annotate it, then send it to the CCP4BB? > > JPK > > ps seriously, why do you say no need for review--is it boring, not well > written, obsolete, or what? James is still pretty useful, I think, and that > was put out only two years later.... > > ******************************************* > Jacob Pearson Keller > Northwestern University > Medical Scientist Training Program > Dallos Laboratory > F. Searle 1-240 > 2240 Campus Drive > Evanston IL 60208 > lab: 847.491.2438 > cel: 773.608.9185 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************* > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marius Schmidt" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jacob Keller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 8:42 PM > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Crystallogrphy today > > >> i have a suggestion for a nice book for you, >> you will love it. it is in German, great!, has over >> 400 pages and it IS THE SOURCE. >> >> M. von Laue >> Roentgenstrahlinterferenzen >> Physik und Chemie und Ihre Anwendungen, Band VI >> 2. Auflage (1st edition burnt down by cannonizing at WWII) >> 1948 >> Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Geest & Portig K.-G., Leipzig >> >> >> everything is covered, even protein crystallography, >> however in a very skeptic way, no need for a review ever. >> >> Cheers >> Marius >> >>> To understand the fundamentals of any discipline, I have always found >>> it >>> completely worthwhile to go back to the original source, where the >>> idea was >>> first discovered or presented. This is really, really valuable, >>> although not >>> always possible. I wonder whether others agree with me about >>> this...but I >>> feel pretty strongly about this matter. Often one can read many >>> reviews on >>> some subject, which never really get to the gist of the matter, but >>> when one >>> reads the original source, the subject is usually laid out clearly >>> because >>> guess what: nobody knew it yet, so it had to be explained clearly. >>> Furthermore, one gets a sense of the excitement of discovery, and the >>> unsurety about some new proposed hypothesis which has not yet become >>> cannonized into fact. For this reason, it is sometimes even >>> worthwhile to >>> saunter down to the...library! >>> >>> Jacob Keller >>> >>> ******************************************* >>> Jacob Pearson Keller >>> Northwestern University >>> Medical Scientist Training Program >>> Dallos Laboratory >>> F. Searle 1-240 >>> 2240 Campus Drive >>> Evanston IL 60208 >>> lab: 847.491.2438 >>> cel: 773.608.9185 >>> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> ******************************************* >> >> >
