After further reflection upon my HKL2000 post a few days ago, I felt I
needed to clarify a few things and address some of the responses that I got
to the post.  Most of all, I think it necessary for me to offer my sysadmin
an unqualified apology.

First off, in no way was my he impeding our ability to get our work done.  I
vented my frustration at HKL2000 not working at him instead of at HKL.  His
assessment of the situation was to get guidance from HKL as to how best to
proceed.  After waiting weeks for a response from them, some of the stop-gap
measures that other users also seemed to think should work, appeared to me
to be our only recourse in the short term.  In the end, it turns out Suse
isn't officially supported by HKL, which may explain the amount of time it
took to hear back from them about it.

Between Suse 10.2 and 10.3, compatibility with previous releases was
eliminated, and so some of the solutions presented by other users weren't
going to work, either.  I neglected to mention the OS we were using, and it
turns out this is important.  Not mucking with the guts of the OS is
probably a good call, and so even temporarily putting a library where it
doesn't belong may solve the symptom, but it doesn't solve the problem.

Finally, to end my mea culpa on a positive note, thanks for the helpful
responses to those who sent them.

Chris

--
Dr. Christopher A. Waddling, Ph.D.
University of California at San Francisco
MC 2140
S126C
600 16th St., 
San Francisco, CA
94158-2517

Reply via email to