It needs Garib to answer this! Eleanor
Charlie Bond wrote: > Eleanor Dodson wrote: > >> It should be more or less equivalent, but better I think to put 1S at >> 0.5 occ and 2O at occ = 1 >> >> At least in REFMAC the restraints to the symmetry atoms should be set up >> > > But if you do that, some of the bond angles will be unrestrained, won't > they?: O1-S-O2 will be OK, but O1-S-O1' and O2-S-O2' will not. Or is > refmac cleverer than I think? > > Cheers, > Charlie >