I suggest that it is not neccessary to submit all images for a reasonable review of a crystallography paper.
Submission and storage of a "few" images at the start of a data collection and a "few" from the end, along with (1) unmerged F or I, including all reflections that are systematic absences for the claimed Space Group (2)data collection parameters (3) data integration and scaling parameters. This should allow for visual inspection of the data frames, which can tell a lot! Also integration and scaling of enough reflections to compare with the submitted total list and a good check of the Space Group and a check on radiation damage/ crystal slippage and cell parameter changes during data collection. I suggest this compromise between no or all images as good for the review process without the need to have everything online. James Phillips Duke University Medical Center
