Before going into an ethics class, I think this material needs to go into a crystallography class. Every crystallographer (and maybe even every structural biologist) should know why the structure is fishy, how fishiness can be detected, how one can make sure one's own structure is legit, etc. Analysis of others' structures and validation of your own, basically going back to how Eleanor started this thread. These past two days have proven infinitely insightful and inspiring to me.
Andreas On 8/17/07, Hurley, Thomas D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just to be clear on my previous email, I encourage all evidence to be > gathered, posted and accumulated for proper evaluation of this case. It > will prove incredibly useful for all involved as this case moves forward. > > > > It is also proving useful for course development – frankly, I am > accumulating files, commentaries, responses and arguments (with appropriate > acknowledgments for their efforts at data analysis in this situation) for > use in our research ethics course – hope no one minds. If anyone does, > please let me know and I'll remove that content, and any reference to that > content in this case study. > > > > My email was just to be wary of what one says in a publicly posted forum. > > > > Tom Hurley > > > > >
