No I haven't :)

Maybe the config is not verbatim with the Proctor guide then ;)

Although I dont think I did it yesterday either..  I will try it when
I get home tonight (9am and I am now at the office).

Thanks for that!

Cheers,
Matt

CCIE #22386
CCSI #31207

On 10 March 2010 08:17, matt reath <[email protected]> wrote:
> Have you made sure to include the 'mpls traffic-eng router-id' in your IGP
> configuration?
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Matt Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I did the traffic engineering labs (Section 11) an the first go was
>> fine.  I thought it would be a good idea to repeat the lab just to
>> make sure I got everything.
>>
>> I did everything the same and it did not work - yes it is GNS3 so I am
>> thinking that may be a factor.
>>
>> Debug shows:
>> debug mpls traffic-eng path lookup
>>
>> TE-PCALC_PATH: get_path: system_id not initialized!
>>
>> Google shows no results for this...
>>
>> Show mpls traffic-eng tunnels shows:
>>
>> R6#show mpls traffic-eng tunnels
>>
>> Name: R6_t0                               (Tunnel0) Destination: 200.0.0.1
>>  Status:
>>    Admin: up         Oper: down   Path: not valid   Signalling: Down
>>    path option 1, type explicit longtunnel
>>    path option 2, type dynamic
>>
>>  Config Parameters:
>>    Bandwidth: 100      kbps (Global)  Priority: 7  7   Affinity:
>> 0x0/0xFFFF
>>    Metric Type: TE (default)
>>    AutoRoute:  enabled   LockDown: disabled  Loadshare: 100      bw-based
>>    auto-bw: disabled
>>
>>  History:
>>    Tunnel:
>>      Time since created: 16 minutes
>>    Path Option 2:
>>      Last Error: PCALC:: Local system ID has not been set
>>
>> The show command and the debug seem to concur that the "system ID has
>> not been set"
>>
>> WTF is it talking about?  ldp works, and I can ping the lookpback at
>> each end of the tunnel, plus I can ping every address in the
>> explicit-path list.
>>
>> I can paste my configs but they are verbatim what is in the proctor
>> guide.  I am leaning towards GNS3 having a hissy-fit and being
>> generally rubbish but if anyone has a better idea then I am keen to
>> hear it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Matt
>>
>> CCIE #22386
>> CCSI #31207
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to