Dear Matt, Thank you a lot for your feedback and your persistent to get to the bottom of this issue.
I was a privilege learning from you. Regards, Karim Okasha On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:41 AM, matt reath <[email protected]> wrote: > I spoke with a guy at cisco on this and he said that IOS only supports > redistributing the L2/L1 routes into OSPF. So I don't think you'd run into > this scenario on the CCIE lab exam. If this where a real scenario of two > companies merging and the merge point is at the end of a L1 area I would > probably do static routing and redistribute that into OSPF. > > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:40 PM, matt reath <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ok, I duplicated your issue. My routes on the Level 1/OSPF router are: >> 150.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 7 subnets, 2 masks >> i ia 150.1.4.0/30 [115/148] via 150.1.4.5, Ethernet0/0 >> i ia 150.1.3.0/24 [115/158] via 150.1.4.5, Ethernet0/0 >> i ia 150.1.2.0/24 [115/158] via 150.1.4.5, Ethernet0/0 >> i ia 150.1.1.0/24 [115/158] via 150.1.4.5, Ethernet0/0 >> C 150.1.4.4/30 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0 >> i ia 150.1.0.0/24 [115/158] via 150.1.4.5, Ethernet0/0 >> C 150.1.4.8/30 is directly connected, Ethernet0/1 >> >> But the OSPF only router connected to this will not get the i ia routes no >> matter what sort of redistribution I do. I'm messing around trying to >> figure a solution out... >> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM, matt reath <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Got ya. I'll throw together a network and duplicate the issue and see >>> what I come up with. >>> >>> >>> On 9/12/09, karim okasha <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Dear Matt, >>> > >>> > The L1 router doesn't have L2 routes it only has L1 and ia routes so >>> also >>> > in >>> > the redistribution command you can't specify the ia routes as they >>> aren't >>> > L1 >>> > nor L2 routes. >>> > >>> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:23 PM, matt reath <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Attach the config and sh ip route from the router doing the >>> >> redistribution >>> >> into OSPF. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:19 AM, matt reath <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> When you do a show ip route do you see both level 1 and level 2 >>> routes >>> >>> from IS-IS? >>> >>> If you do when you do your redistribute isis are specifying level 1 >>> and >>> >>> level 2 routes? >>> >>> >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> >>> >>> router ospf 100 >>> >>> ! redistribute both level-1 and level-2 routes into OSPF >>> >>> redistribute isis level-1-2 metric 1 subnets >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 8:31 AM, matt reath <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm going to take a quick look into this one. Give me a few minutes. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:27 AM, karim okasha >>> >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Dear all, >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I was testing the Route-leaking feature in IS-IS from L2 to L1 and >>> the >>> >>>>> L1 router in the IS-IS area was getting all the backbone routes. >>> This >>> >>>>> L1 >>> >>>>> router is acting as a redistribution point between the IS-IS domain >>> and >>> >>>>> the >>> >>>>> OSPF domain and when i configured the redistribution on this router >>> the >>> >>>>> only >>> >>>>> routes that were being redistributed into OSPF were only the L1 >>> >>>>> routers. I >>> >>>>> was wondering is it possible to redistribution inter-area IS-IS >>> routes >>> >>>>> on L1 >>> >>>>> routers or not? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> >>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from my mobile device >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
