Hi moderator, It turns out I had forgotten the no auto on rip, so there is no need to send this out. Thanks Fulvio
From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: redistributing connected and protocol - what happens? - Plus (for ipexpert fellows) possible issue with Lab 2 Volume 3 Config Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 21:54:32 +0000 Here is my dilemma. When we redistribute connected with a route map that does not match an interface running another protocol and we also redistribute the protocol, do we get the routes in the protocol we are redistributing into? See example below. interface Serial0/1/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco no shutdown ! interface Serial0/1/0.64 multipoint ip address 166.4.6.6 255.255.255.224 frame-relay map ip 166.4.6.4 604 broadcast frame-relay map ip 166.4.6.6 604 router eigrp 1 no auto network 166.4.6.6 0.0.0.0 router rip redis connected route-map RED_CONN_Lo0 metric 5 redistribute eigrp 1 metric 5 route-map RED_CONN_Lo0 match int lo0 should I see the 166.4.6.0/27 route on my rip routers? I thought no, the 166.4.6.0/27 route is a connected route as far as the router doing the redistribution is concern and my route map does not match it, but I can see it in the routing table of my rip routers.....any thoughts? ********Possible issue with LAB2 volume 3 configuration********* We are asked to redistribute loopback 0 into rip onn router 6 as part of 2.6. We are then asked to do mutual redistribution on routers runninng more then one protocol. In your solution you redistribute connected as well (hence my question above) but use a different route-map instead of adding to the previous one in task 2.6 and therfore nullifying the work done in 2.6 _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
