Here is my dilemma. When we redistribute connected with a route map that does
not match an interface running another protocol and we also redistribute the
protocol, do we get the routes in the protocol we are redistributing into? See
example below.
interface Serial0/1/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay lmi-type cisco
no shutdown
!
interface Serial0/1/0.64 multipoint
ip address 166.4.6.6 255.255.255.224
frame-relay map ip 166.4.6.4 604 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 166.4.6.6 604
router eigrp 1
no auto
network 166.4.6.6 0.0.0.0
router rip
redis connected route-map RED_CONN_Lo0 metric 5
redistribute eigrp 1 metric 5
route-map RED_CONN_Lo0
match int lo0
should I see the 166.4.6.0/27 route on my rip routers? I thought no, the
166.4.6.0/27 route is a connected route as far as the router doing the
redistribution is concern and my route map does not match it, but I can see it
in the routing table of my rip routers.....any thoughts?
********Possible issue with LAB2 volume 3 configuration*********
We are asked to redistribute loopback 0 into rip onn router 6 as part of 2.6.
We are then asked to do mutual redistribution on routers runninng more then one
protocol. In your solution you redistribute connected as well (hence my
question above) but use a different route-map instead of adding to the previous
one in task 2.6 and therfore nullifying the work done in 2.6
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
