Hi Guys,

Thanks for handful of tips here. Attached diagram should roughly show the 
topology (Sorry a bit messed up as GNS3 only have the round and rectangular 
shape). 

I was under a quick impression that the traffic will goes out from s1/0.43 to 
R1 (via R3 and R2) rather than the directly connected eth0/0. 
Apparently it wasn't that way after witnessing the entries on sh ip cef. 

10.1.12.1 is not directly connected , so the routers are free to choose which 
way to reach 10.1.12.1.

Plenty of thanks again for your assistance.

Brgds
Benny




> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Local Preference issue.
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:38:03 +0100
> CC: [email protected]; [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> Hi,
> 
>   Good catch. Showing CEF can help a lot.
> 
>   Also Benny, you should check your RIB for how you are learning the 
> 10.1.12.1/32 route.
> 
> Kim
> 
> On Feb 27, 2012, at 7:46 PM, Piotr Jablonski wrote:
> 
> > Hi Benny,
> > 
> > You have a recursive look up. Look at 10.1.12.0 in your cef. This is the
> > answer. This node is reachable via 10.1.14.1. You have a destination IP on
> > both nodes possibly.
> > 
> > Rgds
> > 
> > Pj
> > 27 lut 2012 14:54, "Benny Sumardy" <[email protected]> napisaƂ(a):
> > 
> >> 
> >> Hi Guys,
> >> 
> >> These are the output of :
> >> 
> >> IGP (RIPv2 for connecting BGP links) :
> >> R4#sr | s router rip
> >> router rip
> >> version 2
> >> network 10.0.0.0
> >> no auto-summary
> >> R4#
> >> 
> >> show ip bgp :
> >> 
> >> 
> >> R4#sib
> >> BGP table version is 8, local router ID is 4.4.4.4
> >> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> >> internal,
> >>             r RIB-failure, S Stale
> >> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> >> 
> >>  Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> >> *> 1.0.0.0          10.1.14.1                0    400      0 100 i
> >> *>i2.0.0.0          10.1.23.2                0    100      0 i
> >> *>i3.0.0.0          10.1.34.3                0    100      0 i
> >> *> 4.0.0.0          0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
> >> *  11.0.0.0         10.1.14.1                0             0 100 i
> >> *>i                 10.1.12.1                0    400      0 100 i
> >> R4#
> >> 
> >> 
> >> show ip route 11.1.1.1 & longer :
> >> 
> >> R4#sir 11.1.1.1
> >> Routing entry for 11.0.0.0/8
> >> Known via "bgp 200", distance 200, metric 0
> >> Tag 100, type internal
> >> Last update from 10.1.12.1 00:07:16 ago
> >> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> >> * 10.1.12.1, from 10.1.23.2, 00:07:16 ago
> >>     Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
> >>     AS Hops 1
> >>     Route tag 100
> >>     MPLS label: none
> >> R4#sir 11.1.1.1 longer
> >> Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> >>      D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> >>      N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> >>      E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
> >>      i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
> >>      ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static
> >> route
> >>      o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, + - replicated route
> >> 
> >> Gateway of last resort is not set
> >> 
> >> B     11.0.0.0/8 [200/0] via 10.1.12.1, 00:07:32
> >> R4#
> >> 
> >> show ip cef :
> >> 
> >> R4#sh ip cef
> >> Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
> >> 0.0.0.0/0            no route
> >> 0.0.0.0/8            drop
> >> 0.0.0.0/32           receive
> >> 1.0.0.0/8            10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> >> 2.0.0.0/8            10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> >> 3.0.0.0/8            10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> >> 4.0.0.0/8            attached             Loopback0
> >> 4.0.0.0/32           receive              Loopback0
> >> 4.4.4.4/32           receive              Loopback0
> >> 4.255.255.255/32     receive              Loopback0
> >> 10.1.12.0/24         10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> >> 10.1.12.1/32         10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> >> 10.1.14.0/24         attached             Ethernet0/0
> >> 10.1.14.0/32         receive              Ethernet0/0
> >> 10.1.14.1/32         attached             Ethernet0/0
> >> 10.1.14.4/32         receive              Ethernet0/0
> >> 10.1.14.255/32       receive              Ethernet0/0
> >> 10.1.23.0/24         10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> >> 10.1.23.2/32         10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> >> 10.1.34.0/24         attached             Serial1/0.43
> >> 10.1.34.0/32         receive              Serial1/0.43
> >> 10.1.34.3/32         10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> >> Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
> >> 10.1.34.4/32         receive              Serial1/0.43
> >> 10.1.34.255/32       receive              Serial1/0.43
> >> 11.0.0.0/8           10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> >> 127.0.0.0/8          drop
> >> 224.0.0.0/4          drop
> >> 224.0.0.0/24         receive
> >> 240.0.0.0/4          drop
> >> 255.255.255.255/32   receive
> >> R4#
> >> 
> >> Traceroute :
> >> R4#trace 11.1.1.1
> >> 
> >> Type escape sequence to abort.
> >> Tracing the route to 11.1.1.1
> >> 
> >> 1 10.1.14.1 4 msec *  0 msec
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Did the sh ip route 11.1.1.1, it showed 10.1.12.1 as the next hop. But the
> >> cef listed the next hop to 10.1.14.1 (which is directly connected) rather
> >> than 10.1.12.1 (few hops away) as commanded by Local-Pref.
> >> Absurd, still try to find what's goin on ... Let me know if i still missed
> >> anything...
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Brgds
> >> Benny
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:32:50 +0530
> >>> From: [email protected]
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> CC: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Local Preference issue.
> >>> 
> >>> Yes, it would be more specific route directing traffic towards 14.1 as we
> >>> believe. Can you check routing table and CEF table for the below one.
> >>> 
> >>> show ip route 11.1.1.1
> >>> show ip cef ..
> >>> 
> >>> venkee
> >>> 
> >>> On 27 February 2012 00:26, Rob Pool <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> If it had the same route in an igp an r would show up because the BGP
> >>>> route would prevent it from being inserted in the rib. However, a more
> >>>> specific route in an igp wouldn't prevent the less specific BGP route
> >> from
> >>>> being inserted.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Feb 26, 2012, at 1:49 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> If it had a more specific route from another protocol, wouldn't a "r"
> >>>> for "rib failure"show up for the route in the "sh ip bgp" command?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Could an ICMP redirect from 10.1.12.1 is causing this?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Doug
> >>>>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Local Preference issue.
> >>>>> From: Rob Pool <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Date: Sun, February 26, 2012 10:41 am
> >>>>> To: Benny Sumardy <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Cc: CCIE ONLINE STUDY LIST <[email protected]>
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> My guess would be that you have a more specific route being provided
> >> by
> >>>> an igp or static route.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On Feb 26, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Benny Sumardy <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Applied a local pref value for network 11.0.0.0 (as shown below),
> >> so
> >>>> the best route will prefer 10.1.12.1 (3 hops) than 10.1.14.1 (1 hop).
> >>>>>> But when I do a traceroute, the result still gone through
> >> 10.1.14.1.
> >>>> Can anybody help on what's missing here? Thanks
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Rgds
> >>>>>> Ben
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> R4(config-router)#do sib
> >>>>>> BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 4.4.4.4
> >>>>>> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best,
> >> i -
> >>>> internal,
> >>>>>> r RIB-failure, S Stale
> >>>>>> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> >>>>>> *> 1.0.0.0 10.1.14.1 0 400 0 100 i
> >>>>>> *>i2.0.0.0 10.1.23.2 0 100 0 i
> >>>>>> *>i3.0.0.0 10.1.34.3 0 100 0 i
> >>>>>> *> 4.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
> >>>>>> *>i11.0.0.0 10.1.12.1 0 400 0 100 i
> >>>>>> * 10.1.14.1 0 0 100 i
> >>>>>> R4(config-router)#do trace 11.1.1.1
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Type escape sequence to abort.
> >>>>>> Tracing the route to 11.1.1.1
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 1 10.1.14.1 12 msec * 0 msec
> >>>>>> R4(config-router)#do sir 11.0.0.0
> >>>>>> Routing entry for 11.0.0.0/8
> >>>>>> Known via "bgp 200", distance 200, metric 0
> >>>>>> Tag 100, type internal
> >>>>>> Last update from 10.1.12.1 00:01:14 ago
> >>>>>> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> >>>>>> * 10.1.12.1, from 10.1.23.2, 00:01:14 ago
> >>>>>> Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
> >>>>>> AS Hops 1
> >>>>>> Route tag 100
> >>>>>> MPLS label: none
> >>>>>> R4(config-router)#
> >>>>>> R4(config-router)#do trace 11.1.1.1
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Type escape sequence to abort.
> >>>>>> Tracing the route to 11.1.1.1
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 1 10.1.14.1 4 msec * 4 msec
> >>>>>> R4(config-router)#
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >> please
> >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>>> 
> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>>> 
> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >>>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>> 
> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>> 
> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >> 
> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >> 
> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> > 
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> > 
> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> 
> 
> 
> // Freedom Matters
> CCIE #29189
> http://www.packet-forwarding.net
> 
> 
> 
                                          
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to