Hi Benny,

You have a recursive look up. Look at 10.1.12.0 in your cef. This is the
answer. This node is reachable via 10.1.14.1. You have a destination IP on
both nodes possibly.

Rgds

Pj
27 lut 2012 14:54, "Benny Sumardy" <[email protected]> napisaƂ(a):

>
> Hi Guys,
>
> These are the output of :
>
> IGP (RIPv2 for connecting BGP links) :
> R4#sr | s router rip
> router rip
>  version 2
>  network 10.0.0.0
>  no auto-summary
> R4#
>
> show ip bgp :
>
>
> R4#sib
> BGP table version is 8, local router ID is 4.4.4.4
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> internal,
>              r RIB-failure, S Stale
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
>   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *> 1.0.0.0          10.1.14.1                0    400      0 100 i
> *>i2.0.0.0          10.1.23.2                0    100      0 i
> *>i3.0.0.0          10.1.34.3                0    100      0 i
> *> 4.0.0.0          0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
> *  11.0.0.0         10.1.14.1                0             0 100 i
> *>i                 10.1.12.1                0    400      0 100 i
> R4#
>
>
> show ip route 11.1.1.1 & longer :
>
> R4#sir 11.1.1.1
> Routing entry for 11.0.0.0/8
>  Known via "bgp 200", distance 200, metric 0
>  Tag 100, type internal
>  Last update from 10.1.12.1 00:07:16 ago
>  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>  * 10.1.12.1, from 10.1.23.2, 00:07:16 ago
>      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>      AS Hops 1
>      Route tag 100
>      MPLS label: none
> R4#sir 11.1.1.1 longer
> Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
>       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
>       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
>       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
>       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
>       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static
> route
>       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, + - replicated route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> B     11.0.0.0/8 [200/0] via 10.1.12.1, 00:07:32
> R4#
>
> show ip cef :
>
> R4#sh ip cef
> Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
> 0.0.0.0/0            no route
> 0.0.0.0/8            drop
> 0.0.0.0/32           receive
> 1.0.0.0/8            10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> 2.0.0.0/8            10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> 3.0.0.0/8            10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> 4.0.0.0/8            attached             Loopback0
> 4.0.0.0/32           receive              Loopback0
> 4.4.4.4/32           receive              Loopback0
> 4.255.255.255/32     receive              Loopback0
> 10.1.12.0/24         10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.12.1/32         10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.0/24         attached             Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.0/32         receive              Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.1/32         attached             Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.4/32         receive              Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.255/32       receive              Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.23.0/24         10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.23.2/32         10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.34.0/24         attached             Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.34.0/32         receive              Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.34.3/32         10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
> 10.1.34.4/32         receive              Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.34.255/32       receive              Serial1/0.43
> 11.0.0.0/8           10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> 127.0.0.0/8          drop
> 224.0.0.0/4          drop
> 224.0.0.0/24         receive
> 240.0.0.0/4          drop
> 255.255.255.255/32   receive
> R4#
>
> Traceroute :
> R4#trace 11.1.1.1
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 11.1.1.1
>
>  1 10.1.14.1 4 msec *  0 msec
>
>
> Did the sh ip route 11.1.1.1, it showed 10.1.12.1 as the next hop. But the
> cef listed the next hop to 10.1.14.1 (which is directly connected) rather
> than 10.1.12.1 (few hops away) as commanded by Local-Pref.
> Absurd, still try to find what's goin on ... Let me know if i still missed
> anything...
>
>
> Brgds
> Benny
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:32:50 +0530
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > CC: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Local Preference issue.
> >
> > Yes, it would be more specific route directing traffic towards 14.1 as we
> > believe. Can you check routing table and CEF table for the below one.
> >
> > show ip route 11.1.1.1
> > show ip cef ..
> >
> > venkee
> >
> > On 27 February 2012 00:26, Rob Pool <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > If it had the same route in an igp an r would show up because the BGP
> > > route would prevent it from being inserted in the rib. However, a more
> > > specific route in an igp wouldn't prevent the less specific BGP route
> from
> > > being inserted.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > On Feb 26, 2012, at 1:49 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If it had a more specific route from another protocol, wouldn't a "r"
> > > for "rib failure"show up for the route in the "sh ip bgp" command?
> > > >
> > > > Could an ICMP redirect from 10.1.12.1 is causing this?
> > > >
> > > > Doug
> > > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Local Preference issue.
> > > > From: Rob Pool <[email protected]>
> > > > Date: Sun, February 26, 2012 10:41 am
> > > > To: Benny Sumardy <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: CCIE ONLINE STUDY LIST <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > My guess would be that you have a more specific route being provided
> by
> > > an igp or static route.
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > On Feb 26, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Benny Sumardy <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Applied a local pref value for network 11.0.0.0 (as shown below),
> so
> > > the best route will prefer 10.1.12.1 (3 hops) than 10.1.14.1 (1 hop).
> > > > > But when I do a traceroute, the result still gone through
> 10.1.14.1.
> > > Can anybody help on what's missing here? Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Rgds
> > > > > Ben
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > R4(config-router)#do sib
> > > > > BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 4.4.4.4
> > > > > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best,
> i -
> > > internal,
> > > > > r RIB-failure, S Stale
> > > > > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> > > > >
> > > > > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> > > > > *> 1.0.0.0 10.1.14.1 0 400 0 100 i
> > > > > *>i2.0.0.0 10.1.23.2 0 100 0 i
> > > > > *>i3.0.0.0 10.1.34.3 0 100 0 i
> > > > > *> 4.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
> > > > > *>i11.0.0.0 10.1.12.1 0 400 0 100 i
> > > > > * 10.1.14.1 0 0 100 i
> > > > > R4(config-router)#do trace 11.1.1.1
> > > > >
> > > > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > > > Tracing the route to 11.1.1.1
> > > > >
> > > > > 1 10.1.14.1 12 msec * 0 msec
> > > > > R4(config-router)#do sir 11.0.0.0
> > > > > Routing entry for 11.0.0.0/8
> > > > > Known via "bgp 200", distance 200, metric 0
> > > > > Tag 100, type internal
> > > > > Last update from 10.1.12.1 00:01:14 ago
> > > > > Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> > > > > * 10.1.12.1, from 10.1.23.2, 00:01:14 ago
> > > > > Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
> > > > > AS Hops 1
> > > > > Route tag 100
> > > > > MPLS label: none
> > > > > R4(config-router)#
> > > > > R4(config-router)#do trace 11.1.1.1
> > > > >
> > > > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > > > Tracing the route to 11.1.1.1
> > > > >
> > > > > 1 10.1.14.1 4 msec * 4 msec
> > > > > R4(config-router)#
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > > please visit www.ipexpert.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> > > > >
> > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > > please visit www.ipexpert.com
> > > >
> > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> > > >
> > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> > > visit www.ipexpert.com
> > >
> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> > >
> > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to