Hello,
I am a bit confused with the solution provided by the DSG. The requirements
ask that no excess bursts should be allowed, but looking at the "sh
traffic-shape" output in the DSG, I can see Be values other than zero. Am I
overlooking something, Or does anyone else see something wrong here?
Thank you,
Max
Volume 1, Task23.4
Configure GTS for frame-relay networking on sub-int serial0/0/0.24 on R4.
Configure the BW for interface Serial0/0/0.24 to be 64Kbps.
Classify traffic according to the following policy:
-Telnet and ICMP traffic is shaped to 15% of the BW.
-FTP traffic is 50% of the BW after shaping
-All other traffic gets the remaining 35% of the BW.
-No excess Bursts should be allowed
-Use WFQ
DSG solution and the results from a "sh traffic-shape"
traffic-shape group 101 9600
traffic-shape group 102 32000
traffic-shape group 103 22400
R4(config-subif)#do sh traffic-shape
Interface Se0/0/0.24
Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval
Increment Adapt
VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms)
(bytes) Active
- 101 9600 1992 7968 7968 885
996 -
- 102 32000 2000 8000 8000 250
1000 -
- 103 22400 1988 7952 7952 361
994 -
My configs and the results from a "sh traffic-shape"
traffic-shape group 101 9600 1200 0
traffic-shape group 102 32000 4000 0
traffic-shape group 103 22400 2800 0
R4(config-subif)#do sh traffic-shape
Interface Se0/0/0.24
Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval
Increment Adapt
VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms)
(bytes) Active
- 101 9600 150 1200 0
133 150 -
- 102 32000 500 4000 0
125 500 -
- 103 22400 350 2800 0
127 350 -
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:23 AM
To: Morgan Charpentier
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol1 Task 23.4 GTS
If the task called for GTS and you used MQC I would think your solution
would be considered incorrect.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Morgan Charpentier
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
Does the following solution meet the requirement of the task vol1 23.4 about
GTS ?
Solution guide use multiple interface-based traffic-shape group commands for
each class and I was wondering it it makes any difference with the following
CB-GTS ?
class-map match-any TELNETICMP
match protocol telnet
match protocol icmp
class-map match-all FTP
match protocol ftp
!
!
policy-map CBWFQ
class FTP
bandwidth percent 50
class TELNETICMP
bandwidth percent 15
class class-default
bandwidth percent 35
policy-map SHAPE
class class-default
shape average 64000 6400 0
service-policy CBWFQ
Thanks for your answer
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
