Then using a P-2-P sub-interface would not be the right solution. In your previous reply your wrote: > Point-to-point subinterfaces or PPPoFR as possible solutions Since this requirement is that no Inv-ARP is used, I guess this leaves PPPoFR as the ONLY alternative, correct? If that's the case, then why is that? How exactly does PPPoFR avoid the use of Inv-ARP?
--- On Wed, 4/13/11, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote: From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Basic Frame Relay Question - Sort of To: "Samir Idris" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 5:46 PM On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 13:51, Samir Idris <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Jay, > > sub-interfaces do not send out inverse ARP requests, only the physical > interface does that. Samir, This is not correct. Inverse ARP works on sub-interfaces, too. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
