Ok :-) Markku
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Bryan Bartik <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh nevermind, I think you need some hierarchy there :) > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Bryan Bartik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Makku, >> >> That is correct, the network should be probably changed to something >> behind R1. It's early in the morning, but could you just do this: >> >> class-map match-all ALLBUTVOICEtoR4 >> match not protocol rtp >> match not protocol rtcp >> match not access-group 110 >> >> policy-map SHAPER >> class ALLBUTVOICEtoR4 >> shape average 7000000 875000 0 >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Markku Leiniö <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi! Task 21.5 says: "All traffic from 150.100.220.0/24 network will be >>> placed in the high priority queue", and the solution is obviously >>> >>> access-list 1 permit 150.100.220.0 0.0.0.255 >>> priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 1 >>> int fa0/0 >>> priority-group 1 >>> >>> but it really doesn't make sense. Priority queueing is an output >>> function and 150.100.220.0/24 is located in the direction of fa0/0, so >>> the router will never send a packet out of fa0/0 with source address >>> of 150.100.220.0/24. Technically ok but useless in practice. >>> >>> Is this a example of the "CCIE lab exam logic", I mean, even if the >>> requirement is insane, you just have to configure what is asked? >>> >>> >>> Btw, DSG task 21.2, the MQC part of it, the configuration is missing >>> the 200.0.0.4 part alltogether (only RTP/RTCP part is checked). Since >>> "match access-group" is not allowed, I would use some nesting: >>> >>> access-list 110 permit ip any host 200.0.0.4 >>> class-map match-all AllButVoice >>> match not protocol rtp >>> match not protocol rtcp >>> class-map AllBut4 >>> match not access-group 110 >>> policy-map NoShapingFor4 >>> class AllBut4 >>> shape average 7000000 875000 0 >>> policy-map NoVoiceShaping >>> class AllButVoice >>> service-policy NoShapingFor4 >>> >>> Comments or better ways to implement this? >>> >>> -- >>> Markku >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Bryan Bartik >> CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP >> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > > > > -- > Bryan Bartik > CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP > Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
