Hi Vishal,
Thanks for reply. But my question is different. :)
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, vishal bhugra <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hello Taqdir,
>
> You might have scenario where you don't want to go with synchronization
> rule and disable it. Which will some time end up with black holes in the
> network. So for this you have two solutions :-
>
> 1) Either advertise the IP (using for EBGP peering) in the IGP.
> 2) Use next hop solution.
>
> Guys correct me if I am wrong.. :-)
>
> HTH
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Taqdir Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> please forgive me if this a stupid question
>>
>> why BGP is so designed to carry the eBGP next hop inside local AS by
>> default ?
>> are there any specific scenarios where eBGP next hop should be carried in
>> local AS ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Taqdir Singh
>> +91 -9911709496
>> +91 -8010415988
>>
>> "do today what others wont so you can live tomorrow as others cant"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks®ards
>
> Vishal
> +91-997111066
> Best way to predict the future ..... is to create it
>
--
Taqdir Singh
+91 -9911709496
+91 -8010415988
"do today what others wont so you can live tomorrow as others cant"
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
