I would just stick with OSPF and forget about MPLS... Seems a little small don't you think to be running MPLS? What would you gain from it?
Just my 2 cents! -Adrian On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Fabio Mendes wrote: > So, I had an interesting discussion about this issue with my > colleagues today. > > Some of them think that wee should use OPSF, others IS-IS. My > opinion is that we shoul use BGP. > > Our backbone topology is something like: > > P1----------P2--------P3 > | | | > | | | > | | | > P4----------P5--------P4 > > Each p2p P-to-P lilnk is a /30. > > From my point of view, an issue that could rise using IS-IS or OSPF, > is the LDP/IGP synchronization. In the OSPF case, there is the LSAs > issue too. Although Cisco's IOS has an LDP-IGP synchronization > feature, I am still not comfortable to use it in a such critical > environment. > > In other hand, some of my colleagues point that it's no scalable to > use BGP as IGP. > > What are your thoughts ? > > This is a new project and we are still planning it. If you guys > could point some research (books, sites and so on) I'd appreciate > that. > > > TIA > > Fábio > > -- > > CCNA > CCNP > > "A bird that you set free may be caught again, but a word that > escapes your lips will not return." Jewish Proverb > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
