Indeed, indeed.  The RID is just a 32-bit number, not an IP address.  The
RID could be the same 32-bit number as an IP address happens to be, but it
is not the same thing.  In other words, the RID does not have to be a
reachable IP address

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Bryan Bartik <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yep, exactly :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Kim Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I dont see any reason why it wouldnt, it has the router-ID in its OSPF
>> database, and then it should work automagically..
>>
>> Kim
>>
>> Syed Zaidi wrote:
>> > Thats right it is just a 32 bit address to identify a router in OSPF..
>> > but it is not an IP address. This way I was thinking whether
>> > configuring this address as the virtual link peer of the other ABR
>> > shall enable to bring the virtual link up?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Kim Pedersen <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hi,
>> >
>> >      As far as i know, its purely the router ID, which can be
>> >     represented as an IP address, but in fact its just a 32bit number.
>> >
>> >     Kim
>> >
>> >     Syed Zaidi wrote:
>> >
>> >         Hello!
>> >
>> >         This is about Vlinks in OSPF.
>> >
>> >         While configuring OSPF VL, we configure it between to non
>> >         area0 ABRs, here I would like to know about this..--> when we
>> >         actually configure these VLinks we define other ABR's
>> >         Router-id on both the ABRs... well, what I want to know here
>> >         is; whether this router-id can be the 32 bit address but NOT
>> >         an actual interface IP address of any interfaces on both the
>> >         ABRs? I mean is this setup ok, will it still bring the VIRTUAL
>> >         LINK up?
>> >
>> >         Waiting for a quick answer ASAP.
>> >
>> >         Regards,
>> >         Syed
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >         _______________________________________________
>> >         For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
>> >         training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <
>> http://www.ipexpert.com>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >     --
>> >
>> >     // Freedom Matters
>> >     // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> // Freedom Matters
>> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bryan Bartik
> CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Cell: +1.586.212.6107
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:  [email protected]
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to