Bauke, 1. Do what is explicitly asked. Passive-interface on loopbacks is not asked for.
2. Do-not send OSPF packets is passive-interface. 3. This doesn't look like the full output of the command. What about your output? On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Bauke Dzavhale < [email protected]> wrote: > Team, > > Questions about LAB 11-Volume 2- Task 4-3: > > 1- Without being asked to not to send ospf updates to Loopbacks, the > solution shows all loopbacks in R2, R5, R6 and R& advertised in OSPF (this > was asked), but made passive-interfaces (this was not explicitly asked). Is > this a sort of best practices to be always followed? Does the same apply > with any other loopbacks advertised in other IGPs? > > 2- In Task 4-3 when said "... do not send ospf packets on these links", > that could > not be confused with demand-circuit? > > 3- Finally, why R7 Lo0 (192.168.7.7) does not show up in the RT of R5 ? See > page 428 of the PG?. I believe it should because it was advertised in Task > 4-1. > > Thanks > > > Bauke > > ------------------------------ > The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Optimized for Yahoo! > *Get it Now for Free!* <http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/> > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
