My guess is... If the requirement states not to send unnecessary routing information out an interface, make it passive.
Otherwise don't be concerned about it. Any thoughts? ----- Original Message ----- From: Bauke Dzavhale [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 06:20 PM MST To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 11 - Task 5-1 and Task 6-1 Team, My question here is the similar to the one I posted about Loopbacks in OSPF (see my earlier posting regarding LAB 11 - Task 4-3). Then, [Task 4-3], loopbacks advertised in OSPF were made passive. In Task 5-1, Loopbacks advertised in EIGRP were not made passive. In Task 6-1, Loopback advertised in RIP is made passive. The obvious question is: when to and when not to make the interface passive, if nothing explicitly siggest? Thanks Bauke __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
