All,
I notice a typo between the workbook and the PG as well as what I believe
may be a flaw with the question
First the easy part. The workbook takes about the 100.100.100.0/24 and
100.100.200.0/24 network, but then the PG has the 100.100.250.0/24 network
instead of the 100.100.200.0/24.
Now for the flaw in the question unless I am overlooking something. The
questions states the 0/0 router should be injected to the switches when BOTH
networks are in the routing table. Via the "AND" in the wording of the
question. However, by using one access list linked to one match statement
it would act as an OR and as such only require 1 of the 2 networks to be in
the table for it to inject the route.
If I am correct, you would need to put each network into it's own access
list and then have two match statement in the route-map to may this work
correctly. Am I correct or am I missing some logic?
Rob
