Robert, Good to see you back in the saddle my friend : ) OK on to business. With AutoRP highest IP address wins. It is that simple.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]>wrote: > When using auto-rp... > > If there are two RPs announcing the same group, how does the mapping agent > decide which RP to announce for the group? What is the criteria for the > election process? > > Thanks. > ------------------------------ > > * From: *Joe Astorino [[email protected]] > * Sent: *07/04/2009 10:15 AM AST > * To: *"Meraz, Richard" <[email protected]> > * Cc: *CCIE OSL <[email protected]> > * Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol2 Sect8 Task6.1 VRRP and Object > Tracking > > This solution looks perfectly valid to me Richard. > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Meraz, Richard <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Task 6.1 asks us to configure VRRP and “If R5 loses the route to >> 172.30.21.0, or the metric increases, it should not be preferred gateway.” >> I configured the following: >> >> >> >> IPeR5#sir 172.30.21.0 >> >> Routing entry for 172.30.21.0/24 >> >> Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 65 >> >> >> >> track 1 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 reachability >> >> track 2 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 metric threshold >> >> threshold metric up 65 down 66 >> >> track 100 list boolean or >> >> object 1 >> >> object 2 >> >> >> >> int fa0/0 >> >> vrrp 1 priority 150 >> >> vrrp 1 track 100 decrement 75 >> >> >> >> The PG did not use the* track 100 list boolean or* option. I’m still a >> bit unsure about tracking with multiple objects, and using the and/or >> boolean, so I was wondering if the above configuration would be considered >> correct or not? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rich >> >> >> > > > > -- > Regards, > > Joe Astorino > CCIE #24347 (R&S) > Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > > -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
