I know in BSR we have the priority option. What is the similar option for auto-rp?
----- Original Message ----- From: Robert S Wyzykowski [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:31 AM AST To: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question When using auto-rp... If there are two RPs announcing the same group, how does the mapping agent decide which RP to announce for the group? What is the criteria for the election process? Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: Joe Astorino [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:15 AM AST To: "Meraz, Richard" <[email protected]> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol2 Sect8 Task6.1 VRRP and Object Tracking This solution looks perfectly valid to me Richard. On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Meraz, Richard <[email protected]>wrote: > Task 6.1 asks us to configure VRRP and “If R5 loses the route to > 172.30.21.0, or the metric increases, it should not be preferred gateway.” > I configured the following: > > > > IPeR5#sir 172.30.21.0 > > Routing entry for 172.30.21.0/24 > > Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 65 > > > > track 1 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 reachability > > track 2 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 metric threshold > > threshold metric up 65 down 66 > > track 100 list boolean or > > object 1 > > object 2 > > > > int fa0/0 > > vrrp 1 priority 150 > > vrrp 1 track 100 decrement 75 > > > > The PG did not use the* track 100 list boolean or* option. I’m still a > bit unsure about tracking with multiple objects, and using the and/or > boolean, so I was wondering if the above configuration would be considered > correct or not? > > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > > -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
