I quite like the system in php.net - you've got the "official" docs pages, then a list of user-submitted relevant comments underneath. I often find what I'm looking for in the user comments. If these could be moderated and other users could vote on them, it might make for a fine system to add to the cakephp docs.
On Feb 8, 5:19 pm, Baz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do we keep comparing to Zend? They got an entire team on doc. alone. > > The think that our only problem here lies with 1.2. IMO, the current > 1.1manual is fine for me (maybe have one complete doc, so you don't > have to > keep clicking through chapters). > > The only thing we need right now is to get the 1.2 functionality up to that > level. > > But the only thing I would blatantly plagiarize from Zend is the "list of > examples" at the bottom. > > On Feb 8, 2008 11:08 AM, Mech7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hmmm yes all these blogs scattered everywhere really doesn't help > > anybody... I hope one day cake will have a manual to the standards of > > ZendFW..http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/ > > > It's easy to read and has lots of example code... for every part of > > the framework. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
