> As was stated above, this is to restrict people with commercial interest
> from taking articles from the site, and using them on their own site without
> permission. It in no way restricts the original creator.
My opinion is this is against CakePHP growth. The Foundation should let
everyone take advantage of the submited code and articles, even if they
want to use it in a commercial application.
Before posting re-read PHPNut's WHOLE post very carefully before replying.
The commercial restriction deals with re-publication of content. Use of the code depends on the license used by the author. PHPNut is encouraging (as stated in his post) that you license the code under the MIT license so that it can be used in the same way the core CakePHP code can.
I know sometimes a non-legal description and possibly examples are helpful when determining what a Terms of Service agreement is actually trying to define, but having those won't even help users who choose to just skim it and remember what they want.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
