John Zimmerman wrote: > On 9/28/06, emiliano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > As was stated above, this is to restrict people with commercial interest > > > from taking articles from the site, and using them on their own site > > without > > > permission. It in no way restricts the original creator. > > > > My opinion is this is against CakePHP growth. The Foundation should let > > everyone take advantage of the submited code and articles, even if they > > want to use it in a commercial application. > > > > Before posting re-read PHPNut's WHOLE post very carefully before replying. > > The commercial restriction deals with re-publication of content. Use of the > code depends on the license used by the author. PHPNut is encouraging (as > stated in his post) that you license the code under the MIT license so that > it can be used in the same way the core CakePHP code can. > > I know sometimes a non-legal description and possibly examples are helpful > when determining what a Terms of Service agreement is actually trying to > define, but having those won't even help users who choose to just skim it > and remember what they want.
I'm sorry, english is not my first language. I understood something diferent from PHPNut statement. I hope i didn't bother anyone in the Foundation, and as I said I want the best for the Foundation and the dev team. cheers emiliano --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
