Then 146.54 Scott KD5FBA
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid On Jun 18, 2017 10:46 PM, SETX Telecom via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > > 146.55 is not a standard 2m channel under the Texas Band plan.. 146.54 or > 146.56 is > Why do people have so much trouble remembering that Texas went 20kHz steps in > 146-148 on 2m decades ago?? > > On Jun 18, 2017, at 10:08 PM, Scott Medbury via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 146.55 but will not use if it means having to go to 9a. If someone is >> working our FD stations, they cannot contact for credit the FD station on >> any band. Also we can only have one VHF station and remain 8a. >> >> Scott KD5FBA >> >> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid >> On Jun 18, 2017 9:42 PM, gmuller885 via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Scott >>> Have you com up with a simplex freq for on site.? >>> >>> K9GEM >>> Jerry >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy® Note 4. >>> >>> >>> -------- Original message -------- >>> From: Scott Royall via BVARC <[email protected]> >>> Date: 6/18/17 9:18 PM (GMT-06:00) >>> To: 'BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB' <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Scott Royall <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [BVARC] FW: FD Setup >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Scott Royall [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 21:17 >>> To: 'Glenn Anderson' <[email protected]> >>> Subject: FD Setup >>> >>> >>> >>> Are you going to be there Friday? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BVARC mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org >> Message delivered to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list [email protected] http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org Message delivered to [email protected]
