146.55 is not a standard 2m channel under the Texas Band plan.. 146.54 or 146.56 is Why do people have so much trouble remembering that Texas went 20kHz steps in 146-148 on 2m decades ago??
> On Jun 18, 2017, at 10:08 PM, Scott Medbury via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > > 146.55 but will not use if it means having to go to 9a. If someone is working > our FD stations, they cannot contact for credit the FD station on any band. > Also we can only have one VHF station and remain 8a. > > Scott KD5FBA > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid > On Jun 18, 2017 9:42 PM, gmuller885 via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > Scott > Have you com up with a simplex freq for on site.? > > K9GEM > Jerry > > > > Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy® Note 4. > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Scott Royall via BVARC <[email protected]> > Date: 6/18/17 9:18 PM (GMT-06:00) > To: 'BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB' <[email protected]> > Cc: Scott Royall <[email protected]> > Subject: [BVARC] FW: FD Setup > > > > > > From: Scott Royall [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 21:17 > To: 'Glenn Anderson' <[email protected]> > Subject: FD Setup > > > > Are you going to be there Friday? > > _______________________________________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list [email protected] http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org Message delivered to [email protected]
