On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to transition jobs off of the yahoo-not-h2 label, but again > I don't see a single label I can use that covers an appropriate set of > nodes. > > Can we expand Hadoop to include H10 and H11? No > Can we come up with a > label that covers both the H* and the physical ubuntu hosts that have > been puppetized? > No You are welcome to combine labels - i.e. choosing 'Hadoop && ubuntu' will do exactly what you need. No need to create an all in one label. To expand - the H0-H9 nodes were created under the Hadoop label for Hadoop and related projects. H10 and H11 along with ubuntu-[1-6] were created as general purpose nodes for non Hadoop projects. I'd like to keep that separation and have folks purposely choose multiple labels should they wish to have builds within and without the Hadoop specific nodes. HTH Gav... > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Gav <gmcdon...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Gav <gmcdon...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Why? yahoo-not-h2 is really not required since H2 is the same as > all > >> >> > the > >> >> > other H* nodes. > >> >> > >> >> The yahoo-not-h2 label exists because the H2 node was misconfigured > >> >> for a long time and would fail builds as a result. > >> > > >> > > >> > Yes I know, but now its not, so is no longer needed. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> What label will > >> >> jobs taht are currently configured to avoid H2 be migrated to? Will > >> >> they be migrated automatically? > >> > > >> > > >> > Currently I'm asking that projects make the move themselves. Most jobs > >> > would > >> > be fine as they have > >> > multiple labels, so just need to drop the yahoo-not-h2 label to give > >> > them > >> > access to H2. If, when I drop the label I > >> > see jobs with it in use, I'll remove it. > >> > > >> > >> I don't see a label I can move to that covers the same machines as the > >> current yahoo-not-h2 nodes and H2. It looks like a union of "hadoop" > >> and "docker" would do it, but "docker" is going away. Also I have to > >> have a single label for use in multi-configuration builds or jenkins > >> will treat the two labels as an axis for test selection rather than as > >> just a restriction for where the jobs can run. I could try to go back > >> to using an expression, but IIRC that gave us things like *s in the > >> path used for tests, which was not great. > >> > >> Can we maybe expand the Hadoop label? (or would "beefy" cover the set?) > >> > >> If the H* nodes are all the same, why do we need the labels HDFS, > >> MapReduce, Pig, Falcon, Tez, and ZooKeeper in addition to the Hadoop > >> label? > > > > > > I was thinking the same yep, those could all go too imho but wanted to > > discuss > > that one seperately. > > > > Gav... > > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> busbey > > > > > > > > -- > busbey >
