On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Gav <gmcdon...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Why? yahoo-not-h2 is really not required since H2 is the same as all > the > >> > other H* nodes. > >> > >> The yahoo-not-h2 label exists because the H2 node was misconfigured > >> for a long time and would fail builds as a result. > > > > > > Yes I know, but now its not, so is no longer needed. > > > >> > >> What label will > >> jobs taht are currently configured to avoid H2 be migrated to? Will > >> they be migrated automatically? > > > > > > Currently I'm asking that projects make the move themselves. Most jobs > would > > be fine as they have > > multiple labels, so just need to drop the yahoo-not-h2 label to give them > > access to H2. If, when I drop the label I > > see jobs with it in use, I'll remove it. > > > > I don't see a label I can move to that covers the same machines as the > current yahoo-not-h2 nodes and H2. It looks like a union of "hadoop" > and "docker" would do it, but "docker" is going away. Also I have to > have a single label for use in multi-configuration builds or jenkins > will treat the two labels as an axis for test selection rather than as > just a restriction for where the jobs can run. I could try to go back > to using an expression, but IIRC that gave us things like *s in the > path used for tests, which was not great. > > Can we maybe expand the Hadoop label? (or would "beefy" cover the set?) > > If the H* nodes are all the same, why do we need the labels HDFS, > MapReduce, Pig, Falcon, Tez, and ZooKeeper in addition to the Hadoop > label? > I was thinking the same yep, those could all go too imho but wanted to discuss that one seperately. Gav... > > > -- > busbey >
