+1 for Jenkins +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21 > An: builds@apache.org > Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson > > +1 for jenkins > > for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then > which one I don't care that much. > > Nicolas > > Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit : > > > +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect. > > > > Nige > > > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson > <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : > IMHO > >>>> the most active is the Jenkins one) > >>> > >>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has > >>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves not > >>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have with > our > >>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone > objects, I > >>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >>> > >>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org > >>> > >>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for renaming > >>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins > situation. > >> > >> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ? > >> > >> -Matthias > >> > >>> > >>> /niklas > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Matthias Wessendorf > >> > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >
