OK, then, if you give me a patch, I'll see if my long-dormant karma is effective, at least in getting some attention.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I'm a very rusty hudson dev. So I'm reduced to the following question: >> do we really need interjob hudson dependencies at Apache (the >> downstream/upstream business). > > Yes, they are used quite a lot. And, it would seem that testing > dependent, concurrently developed, projects against each other would > be one of the major tasks of a CI tool like Hudson. > >> If all the jobs are set to turn this >> off, does it still calculate? > > Yes, I think so. > >> Another view of this would be to look to splitting up hudson, and >> maybe fixing this might be less work than that. > > In my opinion, splitting Hudson just gives us another set of problems. > Besides this particular problem, we're not seeing any other > scalability problems at the moment. > > /niklas >
